Translation of a comment by Alexis on Elodie's blog: Pour Que Vive Le Sahaj Marg.
(see also as an article on Alexis' blog: Chari s'en est allé vers Vénus)
4d-Don said: Sahaj Marg is Spiritualism (Mediums, messages from the spirits of the dead, egregores, etc...). It is not Spirituality (i.e. Patanjali's Eightfold Path or Raja Yoga). Spiritualism is a SCAM.
Lalaji is not associated with Sahaj Marg. He never was. Don't blindly believe, check it out!!
Babuji met Lalaji a few times during his life. Lalaji refused to name him (passed him over) "preceptor" in 1930, a few months before he (Lalaji) died in 1931. Babuji only claimed to be his successor over 13 years later in 1945, when he founded his SRCM (Shri Ram Chandra Mission (Shahjahanpur-1945), even though Lalaji had many legal Naqshbandiya SUFI Brotherhood, organizations at the time. Remember, Lalaji was the first Hindu Master of the Naqshbandiya Sufi Brotherhood (with a lineage to the Prophet of Islam, Muhamed). Lalaji's Sufi branch is called: NaqshMuMRa Sufi Stream, and is presided by Lalaji's grandson, Dinaysh.
This (about Venus) is what Chari made up and said. Then in a more recent speech, he also claimed to have lived at the time of Christ when he was allegedly crucified (because his feet now hurt). Then he claimed to have also been a "desert wanderer" ... Yeah, Right!! One can claim what one wishes, it does not necessarily make it true. If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell to you ...
Chari in his "Constitution and Bye-Laws" ( yes, that's "bye" as opposed to "hello"?) states that his SRCM (California-1997), registered in San Luis Obispo, California, in the section on "evil practices", adheres to the "principles of Spiritualism" ... not Spirituality. What are the "principles of Spiritualism"? Silly? Yup!! There are no such things.
See here and compare both Constitutions (specially the "evil practices" section 11 on page 14) : http://4d-don.blogspot.ca/2012/06/sahaj-marg-legal-and-important.html
Spiritualism is not Spirituality !! Don't take the lies (Meds?) Sahaj Marg feeds you, and think straight.
Don't be lured into going to "Venus" ... It is not habitable, even in the invented stories (fantasies) of spiritualist scammers, who fictitiously credit their fantasies to un-named "spirits". That is the nature of "spiritualism"... It is not "THE TRUTH". It is not "REALITY". It is "FICTION" and "FANTASY".
Babuji claimed that his Sahaj Marg was about facing REALITY. Chari's usurped Sahaj Marg is quite different!!
Dec. 22, 2014
Chari Has Gone to Venus?
Parthasarathi Rajagopalachari, 87, died Saturday, December 20 at 21 h 45. Always in a hurry, he (allegedly) already communicated with his favorite medium the very next morning at 10:00 AM.
In December 2007 at Vrads, Chari had announced that he was 99% sure that Babuji would send him on a mission to Venus whenever he arrived at the Brighter World. That should not be very long.
Let us wish him a good journey to Venus and let us return for a moment to our good old planet Earth.
What is going to happen now? Officially, the sinister Kamlesh Patel succeeds him as president of SRCM and as spiritual representative of Sahaj Marg.
Will Abhyasis accept this decision of Chari without snorting? Will he be as successful as Chari? No one knows ...
How will this declared "dauphin" fit between Santosh Khanjee, the organizer and Chari's henchmen such as A.P. Durai or U.S. Bajpai?
Will Chari's son, manager of the PR Krishna estate, and his grandchildren, Barghav Krishna and Madhuri, leave him the power?
Will the central bankers (funders?) of the Mission, Madhava Reddy and Ilya Kazmaly, continue to pay or will they close the taps?
After the messages (whispers?) from Babuji, what about the medium? What statements is she going to attach to Chari?
Externally, what are the positions of Dinesh Kumar Saxena, the grand-son of Lalaji; and (what about) Navneet Kumar Saxena and Sharad Chandra Saxena, the grandsons of Babuji?
What about the followers of Kasturi Chaturvedi, the spiritual companion of Babuji; K.C. Narayana, the son of K.C. Varadachari, S.P. Srivastava or even the heirs of Raghavendra Rao?
The hounds are released. Membership, implosion or explosion ... the challenge is on!
Alexis
Monday, December 22, 2014
See also (the original statements by Chari):
The Brighter World of Venus? (Chari of Sahaj Marg)
.
.
Showing posts with label Ilya Mikhailovich Kazmaly. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ilya Mikhailovich Kazmaly. Show all posts
Friday, January 02, 2015
Monday, October 27, 2014
Sahaj Marg is Responsible for the Apocalypse it Announces
Translation of an article by Elodie: "Le Sahaj Marg Responsable de l'Apocalypse Qu'il Annonce", on her blog in Europe: Pour Que Vive Le Sahaj Marg.
October 27, 2014
Sahaj Marg, Responsible for the Apocalypse it Announces
The Whispers of Babuji keep repeating that mankind will soon hit the wall and is headed for disaster. The Whispers do not give in half measures, but the Whispers never explain what is going wrong. One thing is certain: everything is (allegedly) rotten, salvation will come after the disaster, thanks to Sahaj Marg and only its abhyasis will be saved.
But when we see, as is shown by the latest comments from Anonymous, to what extent some responsible for the SRCM are involved in today's society, it raises questions about what may distinguish them from the ordinary mortals.
The bosses of Sahaj Marg are fully invested into the sphere of modern capitalism in all its components: individualism and frantic competition, the race to profit, short-term vision, etc.
In the new technologies (Madhava Reddy, Shiv Kaushik, Sanjay Sehgal ...), in the pharmaceuticals industry (Madhu Kothapalli, Kamlesh Patel, ...), in textile manufacturing (Ajay Kumar Bhatter, Chari...), even to the most savage capitalism (the kleptocratic Ilya Kazmaly), etc.
How is their behavior different from the rest of humanity? This humanity which runs headlong towards its doom?
They seem perfectly integrated in this world which Babuji (in his "whispers", as channeled by the Anonymous French Lady Medium?) criticizes so, and perhaps even a little more than the average. In any case, Chari's example shows that he took full advantage of the system he claims to abhor, for the benefit of the SRCM.
Elodie
.
.
October 27, 2014
Sahaj Marg, Responsible for the Apocalypse it Announces
The Whispers of Babuji keep repeating that mankind will soon hit the wall and is headed for disaster. The Whispers do not give in half measures, but the Whispers never explain what is going wrong. One thing is certain: everything is (allegedly) rotten, salvation will come after the disaster, thanks to Sahaj Marg and only its abhyasis will be saved.
But when we see, as is shown by the latest comments from Anonymous, to what extent some responsible for the SRCM are involved in today's society, it raises questions about what may distinguish them from the ordinary mortals.
The bosses of Sahaj Marg are fully invested into the sphere of modern capitalism in all its components: individualism and frantic competition, the race to profit, short-term vision, etc.
In the new technologies (Madhava Reddy, Shiv Kaushik, Sanjay Sehgal ...), in the pharmaceuticals industry (Madhu Kothapalli, Kamlesh Patel, ...), in textile manufacturing (Ajay Kumar Bhatter, Chari...), even to the most savage capitalism (the kleptocratic Ilya Kazmaly), etc.
How is their behavior different from the rest of humanity? This humanity which runs headlong towards its doom?
They seem perfectly integrated in this world which Babuji (in his "whispers", as channeled by the Anonymous French Lady Medium?) criticizes so, and perhaps even a little more than the average. In any case, Chari's example shows that he took full advantage of the system he claims to abhor, for the benefit of the SRCM.
Elodie
.
.
Sunday, October 12, 2014
$ahaj Marg: A Financial $pirituality
Translation of an article by Alexis: "$ahaj Marg: Une $piritualité Financière", published on Elodie's blog in Europe: Pour Que Vive Le Sahaj Marg.
Comment by 4d-Don: It appears that the "cleaning" ritual of this so-called "spiritual" path may also involve the "cleaning" (or "laundering") of the so-called "corrupt " or material MONEY!!
Is this what some call the all-new: "Spiritual capitalism" or is that: "Spiritualist capitalism"??
Chari's education foundation was called: Baal Vatika (translation: Baal Vatika = The Hermitage of Baal ) ... Is SRCM and Sahaj Marg(tm) attempting to become the all-new and laundered "Vatican" of Roman Catholicism??
Corruption or simply "GREED" ... POWER Lust! or simply: BUSINESS!
October 12, 2014
Sahaj Marg: A Financial $pirituality
A new article by Alexis: The main funders of $ahaj Marg in 2013
Eight million dollars in foreign donations in 2013, down only slightly from 2012, the year that set the record. Financial capital reported almost as much, or $7 million in interest. Record expenditure of $8 million, with the purchase of land and property at its peak.
The financial capital for SRCM and SMSF from foreigners and from Indians together now reached $60 million, it still grew by 12% in 2013.
Topping the list of foreign donors include Madhava Reddy, his company and his foundation retaking the lead with $6,000,000. The Transnistrian (Russian?) oligarch Ilya Kazmaly and his offshore company (ies), champions in 2012, still ranks second with $590,000.
Virtually ignoring Kamlesh Patel, his family and pharmacies, but we see the rise of some entrepreneurs: Shiv Kaushik and his company ICCG for $130,000 (in 5th place in the cumulative 8-year track record) or even Dayalan Veera and his company Master Scan for $120,000 (in 8th place over the past 8 years).
Overall, over a period of 8 years (2006-2013), the cumulative foreign donations reach $40 million, the interests on the capital $25 million, for a total proceeds of $65 million. Cumulative expenditure represents $24 million. Financial capital is increased from $19 to $60 million in 8 years.
Chari has won his wager: to finance the expenses of the Mission with the interest of the $ M $ F (SMSF - Sahaj Marg Spirituality (or "Spiritualism"?) Foundation) its foundation. Donations are not required anymore, but his wager was so successful that the donations continue to grow, with $21 million (or more than by half) in the past two years.
Difficult to predict a trend when 3 quarters of the donations over 8 years are based on 10 people; 60% on the shoulders of Reddy and Kazmaly. Logic suggests that interest becomes the main source of funding, but as these big donors (seem to?) will continue, it is the financial capital that flies, allowing ever more reckless spending.
At this rate, the foreign financial capital could reach $90 million by 2020, with $12 million annual in interest, as much in donations and spending almost as much ...
If we add the Indian capital, the land and the property, Chari is at the head of a wealthy multinational ... rich in spiritual and/or material?
Alexis
Other Links (in French) :
Recyclage d’argentsale ?
.
.
Comment by 4d-Don: It appears that the "cleaning" ritual of this so-called "spiritual" path may also involve the "cleaning" (or "laundering") of the so-called "corrupt " or material MONEY!!
Is this what some call the all-new: "Spiritual capitalism" or is that: "Spiritualist capitalism"??
Chari's education foundation was called: Baal Vatika (translation: Baal Vatika = The Hermitage of Baal ) ... Is SRCM and Sahaj Marg(tm) attempting to become the all-new and laundered "Vatican" of Roman Catholicism??
Corruption or simply "GREED" ... POWER Lust! or simply: BUSINESS!
October 12, 2014
Sahaj Marg: A Financial $pirituality
A new article by Alexis: The main funders of $ahaj Marg in 2013
Eight million dollars in foreign donations in 2013, down only slightly from 2012, the year that set the record. Financial capital reported almost as much, or $7 million in interest. Record expenditure of $8 million, with the purchase of land and property at its peak.
The financial capital for SRCM and SMSF from foreigners and from Indians together now reached $60 million, it still grew by 12% in 2013.
Topping the list of foreign donors include Madhava Reddy, his company and his foundation retaking the lead with $6,000,000. The Transnistrian (Russian?) oligarch Ilya Kazmaly and his offshore company (ies), champions in 2012, still ranks second with $590,000.
Virtually ignoring Kamlesh Patel, his family and pharmacies, but we see the rise of some entrepreneurs: Shiv Kaushik and his company ICCG for $130,000 (in 5th place in the cumulative 8-year track record) or even Dayalan Veera and his company Master Scan for $120,000 (in 8th place over the past 8 years).
Overall, over a period of 8 years (2006-2013), the cumulative foreign donations reach $40 million, the interests on the capital $25 million, for a total proceeds of $65 million. Cumulative expenditure represents $24 million. Financial capital is increased from $19 to $60 million in 8 years.
Chari has won his wager: to finance the expenses of the Mission with the interest of the $ M $ F (SMSF - Sahaj Marg Spirituality (or "Spiritualism"?) Foundation) its foundation. Donations are not required anymore, but his wager was so successful that the donations continue to grow, with $21 million (or more than by half) in the past two years.
Difficult to predict a trend when 3 quarters of the donations over 8 years are based on 10 people; 60% on the shoulders of Reddy and Kazmaly. Logic suggests that interest becomes the main source of funding, but as these big donors (seem to?) will continue, it is the financial capital that flies, allowing ever more reckless spending.
At this rate, the foreign financial capital could reach $90 million by 2020, with $12 million annual in interest, as much in donations and spending almost as much ...
If we add the Indian capital, the land and the property, Chari is at the head of a wealthy multinational ... rich in spiritual and/or material?
Alexis
Other Links (in French) :
.
.
Monday, January 13, 2014
Who Owns the SRCM (Shri Ram Chandra Mission)?
Taken and translated from an article by Alexis: "A Qui Appartient la SRCM?", on Élodie's blog in Europe: Pour Que Vive Le Sahaj Marg.
Jan. 14, 2014
Foreign Donation ... Let's Talk Money
An update article by Alexis Jan. 12, 2014
In 1976, so as to control NGO (Non-Government Organizations) funds coming from abroad, the Indian government put in place the "Foreign Contribution Regulation Act" (FCRA) to avoid the excessive "... influence of the foreign hand" on the policy and the public projects of India. Each year, the Department of Indian Affairs publishes a list of the NGOs in the country. For those who exceed ten million rupees in revenue from abroad, it also publishes the names of donors and the amount of their "foreign contribution", as well as the total amount of expenditures made by the NGO (see http://mha.nic.in/fcra.htm ).
To see List of Foreign Donors (with dates and amounts):
*Click on FCRA link.
*Under: "Foreigner's Division" (Yellow tab on left), scroll down and click on: "Associations that received over one crore rupees in a financial year".
*Select year, and then Select State and click on "Get Records": (The Foundation (SMSF) is in Tamil Nadu, and the Society (SRCM) is in Uttar Pradesh).
*Click on the society (SRCM) or the Foundations (SMSF, LMES, BVET, etc...) to see the lists of donors.
* Click on "Find" (Look under "Edit" in your browser) to find the info on a donor inside the document. Enter the "search words" in the box which opens up at the bottom of the page.
Regarding Chari's Sahaj Marg(tm), the Indian SMSF, SRCM, LMES (Lalaji Memorial Education Society), and BVET (Chari Foundation: Baal Vatika Education Trust) are duly recorded (RCN respective Registration Numbers: TN 075900957R, UP 136700005R, TN 075901050R and TN 075901033R). The SMSF and the SRCM blithely exceed the threshold, and their accounts are available for the years 2006 to 2011. The LMES appears in 2006, 2008 and 2009. The BVET does not reach this threshold during this period ...
Let us recall and understand that Chari's school (Lalaji Memorial Omega International School or LMOIS) is controlled and funded by two societies: LMES (Lalaji Memorial Educational Society) and the BVET. (Chari's Baal Vatika Educational Trust). (Baal = Master or Lord ?, Vatika = Hermitage (note "Vatican" roots)
Foreign Contributions
According to the FCRA, donations from abroad (Foreign contributions, from all countries excluding India) SRCM and the Indian SMSF together, accumulated over 7 years ( 04/01/2006 to 31/03/2013 ), totalled more than 31 million. The amount of foreign capital of these two organizations has increased by a multiple of almost 3, from nearly 19 million to more than $53 million over the same period. The amount of accumulated vested interests exceeds 18 million, or 58% of the amount of donations and 34 % of the current capital. Cumulative expenditures are less than 16 million.
The "corpus fund" Mission established by Chari has far exceeded its goal. If donations stopped abruptly tomorrow, capital would continue to grow without Chari having to cut corners. The financial autonomy of the Mission of Chari and his successors is already reached! This does not stop Chari from encouraging more donations from his members to the foundations of Sahaj Marg ...
Who funds the Mission?
Chari's financial appetite is limitless. And this calls into question the independence of the Mission already reached. Indeed, four donors are responsible for more than half of the 7-year cumulative donations, nearly $17 million. Each of them gave more than $ 2 million to the Mission in 7 years, while the fifth most important donor donated less than $300 thousand.
Their potential influence is huge! Chari used "kid gloves" with them. It is therefore not surprising that one of them is his designated successor, another has his own cottage (just like Chari) in the womb of Babuji Memorial ashram ...
If we put aside the 4 larger donors, of the $15 million remaining, 38% comes from North America, 23% from Western Europe and 8% from Asia (excluding India). The most important donor countries are the USA 36%, France for a little more than 8 %, Switzerland for almost 8% and 3% for the United Arab Emirates.
The top 50 largest donors (excluding the four largest) has contributed more than $ 2.5 million, 35 of them are Indian, 25 are of Indo-American origin. Most are at the head of start-ups in computer hardware or software, or in the production of generic drugs.
But Then, Who Therefore Owns the Mission?
Do you want the answer ?
Number 1: Ilya Mikhailovich Kazmaly paid $10.3 million in 7 years, 33% of foreign donations made to the Mission and its SMSF foundation under the FCRA, in his own name or that of his wife and an offshore company called Mentor Financial Ltd.
Gagauz of Russian origin, born April 7, 1962, Kazmaly worked as an officer of the Soviet intelligence services before co-founding the Sheriff group in 1993, the first company in Moldova. Elected to the Supreme Soviet of the country in 2005, he has long been a principal supporter of President Smirnov. To learn more, read [ Sahaj Marg's Gift of $10 million dollars or Sahaj Marg(tm), Let's Talk Money] .
Number 2: Madhava Reddy supports U.S. Republicans but even more the SRCM. Personally, through the Lachimi Foundation or through its start-up HTC Global Services, has paid $ 6.5 million in 7 years according to the FCRA , 21 % of foreign donations made to the Mission and its foundation SMSF .
This accountant is the founding CEO in 1992 Hi Tech Consultant Global Services Inc in Troy, Michigan (www.htcinc.com). According to The Hindu Business Line, dated March 8, 2012, the computer technology and solutions company employs 4,000 people and exudes an income of about $160 million. It is also present in India (at Chennai and Hyderabad), Australia, Canada, Malaysia, Singapore and the United Kingdom. Also, two of its vice- presidents both paid 3 million rupees to the Mission and its foundation for the same period. Incidentally, Reddy is also a member of the Board of Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories Ltd. (www.caraco.com), a subsidiary of the Sunpharma group.
In 1999, Madhava Reddy created the Lachimi Foundation to implement the bulk of his donations to the Mission without having to pay taxes. Between 1999 and 2011, the accounts of the Lachimi Foundation shows payments totaling more than $12 million.
Chari has long resided in the cottage of this preceptor of Sahaj Marg and a member of the Board of Directors of the SRCM in the U.S., according to Echoes of India, November 2012.
Number 3: Madhusudanarao Kothapalli donated $2.5 million for the same period in the Mission and its foundation under the FCRA, or 8% of all foreign donations, personally or through his foundation. Originally from Hyderabad in Andrah Pradesh, the Indo-US emigrant co-founded the CorePharma LLC in 1998 in New Jersey (www.corepharma.com). In 2005, he sold his shares in the company to RoundTable Healthcare Partners LLP, created the Aravind Foundation and paid $5 million through the foundation: 1 million to the SRCM and another to Baal Vatika Educational Society (the future LMES) in 2005, $3 million to the SMSF in 2006 ... and again $28,000 to the SRCM in 2009.
In 2011, Madhu Kothapalli founded another company's R & D generic drugs at his home in Hyderabad (www.Leiutis.com) . Chari is in the habit of inviting himself into the residence of this preceptor when staying in Hyderabad.
Number 4: Kamlesh Patel Desaibhai, vice president and designated successor of Chari, paid $2.1 million under the FCRA personally or through his family and network of pharmacies, or more than 7% of all foreign donations. Two of his colleagues and friends pharmacists from New York also paid them more than 5 million rupees, but I did not find any evidence that they work for him ...
To learn more, read (in French... translate with "Google Translate") [The Brooklyn Pharmacist].
The Money of the Mission
According to the FCRA numbers of 2006 and 2012, taking into account only the money from abroad, the Mission and its Indian Foundation therefore shared an average annual turnover of more than $7 million and a capital more than $53 million.
What about the money from the sale of publications and membership fees, when you know that a few years ago, the donations did not represent more than one third of the resources of the Mission?
What about the additional Indian share, when we know that the bulk of the strength of the Mission is Indian?
What about other foundations in Switzerland, the United States, Dubai or Hong Kong?
What about the other national SRCM associations?
Alexis
.
.
Jan. 14, 2014
Foreign Donation ... Let's Talk Money
An update article by Alexis Jan. 12, 2014
In 1976, so as to control NGO (Non-Government Organizations) funds coming from abroad, the Indian government put in place the "Foreign Contribution Regulation Act" (FCRA) to avoid the excessive "... influence of the foreign hand" on the policy and the public projects of India. Each year, the Department of Indian Affairs publishes a list of the NGOs in the country. For those who exceed ten million rupees in revenue from abroad, it also publishes the names of donors and the amount of their "foreign contribution", as well as the total amount of expenditures made by the NGO (see http://mha.nic.in/fcra.htm ).
To see List of Foreign Donors (with dates and amounts):
*Click on FCRA link.
*Under: "Foreigner's Division" (Yellow tab on left), scroll down and click on: "Associations that received over one crore rupees in a financial year".
*Select year, and then Select State and click on "Get Records": (The Foundation (SMSF) is in Tamil Nadu, and the Society (SRCM) is in Uttar Pradesh).
*Click on the society (SRCM) or the Foundations (SMSF, LMES, BVET, etc...) to see the lists of donors.
* Click on "Find" (Look under "Edit" in your browser) to find the info on a donor inside the document. Enter the "search words" in the box which opens up at the bottom of the page.
Regarding Chari's Sahaj Marg(tm), the Indian SMSF, SRCM, LMES (Lalaji Memorial Education Society), and BVET (Chari Foundation: Baal Vatika Education Trust) are duly recorded (RCN respective Registration Numbers: TN 075900957R, UP 136700005R, TN 075901050R and TN 075901033R). The SMSF and the SRCM blithely exceed the threshold, and their accounts are available for the years 2006 to 2011. The LMES appears in 2006, 2008 and 2009. The BVET does not reach this threshold during this period ...
Let us recall and understand that Chari's school (Lalaji Memorial Omega International School or LMOIS) is controlled and funded by two societies: LMES (Lalaji Memorial Educational Society) and the BVET. (Chari's Baal Vatika Educational Trust). (Baal = Master or Lord ?, Vatika = Hermitage (note "Vatican" roots)
Foreign Contributions
According to the FCRA, donations from abroad (Foreign contributions, from all countries excluding India) SRCM and the Indian SMSF together, accumulated over 7 years ( 04/01/2006 to 31/03/2013 ), totalled more than 31 million. The amount of foreign capital of these two organizations has increased by a multiple of almost 3, from nearly 19 million to more than $53 million over the same period. The amount of accumulated vested interests exceeds 18 million, or 58% of the amount of donations and 34 % of the current capital. Cumulative expenditures are less than 16 million.
The "corpus fund" Mission established by Chari has far exceeded its goal. If donations stopped abruptly tomorrow, capital would continue to grow without Chari having to cut corners. The financial autonomy of the Mission of Chari and his successors is already reached! This does not stop Chari from encouraging more donations from his members to the foundations of Sahaj Marg ...
Who funds the Mission?
Chari's financial appetite is limitless. And this calls into question the independence of the Mission already reached. Indeed, four donors are responsible for more than half of the 7-year cumulative donations, nearly $17 million. Each of them gave more than $ 2 million to the Mission in 7 years, while the fifth most important donor donated less than $300 thousand.
Their potential influence is huge! Chari used "kid gloves" with them. It is therefore not surprising that one of them is his designated successor, another has his own cottage (just like Chari) in the womb of Babuji Memorial ashram ...
If we put aside the 4 larger donors, of the $15 million remaining, 38% comes from North America, 23% from Western Europe and 8% from Asia (excluding India). The most important donor countries are the USA 36%, France for a little more than 8 %, Switzerland for almost 8% and 3% for the United Arab Emirates.
The top 50 largest donors (excluding the four largest) has contributed more than $ 2.5 million, 35 of them are Indian, 25 are of Indo-American origin. Most are at the head of start-ups in computer hardware or software, or in the production of generic drugs.
But Then, Who Therefore Owns the Mission?
Do you want the answer ?
Number 1: Ilya Mikhailovich Kazmaly paid $10.3 million in 7 years, 33% of foreign donations made to the Mission and its SMSF foundation under the FCRA, in his own name or that of his wife and an offshore company called Mentor Financial Ltd.
Gagauz of Russian origin, born April 7, 1962, Kazmaly worked as an officer of the Soviet intelligence services before co-founding the Sheriff group in 1993, the first company in Moldova. Elected to the Supreme Soviet of the country in 2005, he has long been a principal supporter of President Smirnov. To learn more, read [ Sahaj Marg's Gift of $10 million dollars or Sahaj Marg(tm), Let's Talk Money] .
Number 2: Madhava Reddy supports U.S. Republicans but even more the SRCM. Personally, through the Lachimi Foundation or through its start-up HTC Global Services, has paid $ 6.5 million in 7 years according to the FCRA , 21 % of foreign donations made to the Mission and its foundation SMSF .
This accountant is the founding CEO in 1992 Hi Tech Consultant Global Services Inc in Troy, Michigan (www.htcinc.com). According to The Hindu Business Line, dated March 8, 2012, the computer technology and solutions company employs 4,000 people and exudes an income of about $160 million. It is also present in India (at Chennai and Hyderabad), Australia, Canada, Malaysia, Singapore and the United Kingdom. Also, two of its vice- presidents both paid 3 million rupees to the Mission and its foundation for the same period. Incidentally, Reddy is also a member of the Board of Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories Ltd. (www.caraco.com), a subsidiary of the Sunpharma group.
In 1999, Madhava Reddy created the Lachimi Foundation to implement the bulk of his donations to the Mission without having to pay taxes. Between 1999 and 2011, the accounts of the Lachimi Foundation shows payments totaling more than $12 million.
Chari has long resided in the cottage of this preceptor of Sahaj Marg and a member of the Board of Directors of the SRCM in the U.S., according to Echoes of India, November 2012.
Number 3: Madhusudanarao Kothapalli donated $2.5 million for the same period in the Mission and its foundation under the FCRA, or 8% of all foreign donations, personally or through his foundation. Originally from Hyderabad in Andrah Pradesh, the Indo-US emigrant co-founded the CorePharma LLC in 1998 in New Jersey (www.corepharma.com). In 2005, he sold his shares in the company to RoundTable Healthcare Partners LLP, created the Aravind Foundation and paid $5 million through the foundation: 1 million to the SRCM and another to Baal Vatika Educational Society (the future LMES) in 2005, $3 million to the SMSF in 2006 ... and again $28,000 to the SRCM in 2009.
In 2011, Madhu Kothapalli founded another company's R & D generic drugs at his home in Hyderabad (www.Leiutis.com) . Chari is in the habit of inviting himself into the residence of this preceptor when staying in Hyderabad.
Number 4: Kamlesh Patel Desaibhai, vice president and designated successor of Chari, paid $2.1 million under the FCRA personally or through his family and network of pharmacies, or more than 7% of all foreign donations. Two of his colleagues and friends pharmacists from New York also paid them more than 5 million rupees, but I did not find any evidence that they work for him ...
To learn more, read (in French... translate with "Google Translate") [The Brooklyn Pharmacist].
The Money of the Mission
According to the FCRA numbers of 2006 and 2012, taking into account only the money from abroad, the Mission and its Indian Foundation therefore shared an average annual turnover of more than $7 million and a capital more than $53 million.
What about the money from the sale of publications and membership fees, when you know that a few years ago, the donations did not represent more than one third of the resources of the Mission?
What about the additional Indian share, when we know that the bulk of the strength of the Mission is Indian?
What about other foundations in Switzerland, the United States, Dubai or Hong Kong?
What about the other national SRCM associations?
Alexis
.
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
