Wednesday, September 02, 2009

Chari & SRCM (California-1997) Judges "Reconciliation"??

OPEN ESSAY to the Judging Committee of the United Nations International Year of Reconciliation (2009) regarding the annual Essay Competition of the "Annual All India Essay Writing Event" offered to youth in all schools in India to mark the International Day of Youth, August 12, 2009 .

Using the description of the desirable "essays" as presented by SRCM (California-1997) :

* Give Love Get Love
* Do unto others as you would have them do unto you
* Love has hope, Hatred is Hopeless,

and the "thoughts suggested" to the competitors by the SRCM (California-1997)

* How does peace and friendship in society benefit the individual?

* Can there be Irreconcilable differences if everyone accepted this?
R. Ingersoll said: "Give to every other human being every right that you claim for yourself."
What do you think? Can Love be a potent instrument of reconciliation?

I hereby present my essay
(from French, meaning: "to try") ...

It seems to me that to be qualified to judge a competition on "reconciliation", the judging organization and/or the judging committee should have among its membership, some people with experience and/or qualities as "reconciliators". One that comes to mind is South Africa's Anglican Church Bishop, Desmond Tutu. I am sure that there are many others. When an organization uses violence and other un-ethical and immoral methods to achieve it's ends, that organism should not qualify to be a judge on "RECONCILIATION", unless the content of the essay is totally irrelevant, and what is being judged is: spelling, syntax, grammar, rhetoric, etc.

Here are some examples of lack of "reconciliation" at SRCM (California-1997) and by it's first Master, Chari:

In a speech to preceptors (priests) in 2001, Chari said:

"In the Indian scene, the Hindus and Hinduism is corrupt. God is personified as somebody who can be bribed with gifts, with so called prasads - offering temptation of Heaven which fact Babuji emphasized in His teachings, saying that religions depends on two instruments - temptation and fear

I am afraid that Sahaj Marg is suffering in this way because even when Christian people become abhyasis and preceptors, they somehow, somewhere along the way seem to lose this idea of love, charity, compassion, faith and become preceptors. So what Spirituality offers and can deliver, our priesthood, I would categorize you as, say temporarily as priesthood - they destroy."
(Speech, Preceptor's Seminar, Jan. 2001)

In the Value Based Spiritual Education (VBSE) curriculum taught at the SRCM (California-1997) school, Lalaji Memorial OMEGA International School (LMOIS):

There are five very important reasons, why we should get away from religious bondage –

a. It creates division among people.
b. Every religion talks of "one God" but states that only their God is the best.
c. It promotes disharmony, violence and wars.
d. The real meaning of the tenets is forgotten and only the rituals are adhered to.
e. Religions put fear and temptations into the hearts of the people.

All religions in the world say the same thing i.e. "seek within". But do they? The answer is NO. Then what is the way? Transcend religion and move towards spirituality.

...Religion enforces an externalization of the mind in man’s search for God. Religion requires belief and faith. Religion speaks of seeing God, speaking with God, hearing God’s voice, etc.

That is exactly what the evidence shows SRCM (California-1997)) is doing.

"Methinks they doth protest too much" is an appropriate line by Shakespeare.

About "same-sex marriages" and "homosexuality" in general Chari said:
see also blog: Chari-ty creates a "gay-bashing" egregore!)

Balance-The Crux of Life
A talk given by Shri Parthasarathi Rajagopalachari (aka: Chari)
on 20th January, 2006 in Malaysia


So what wonders can it do if this is on a global scale? That is why Sahaj Marg is performing marriages—no questions asked, except whether you are old enough to get married, and whether you are a man and a woman. Unlike the churches in the world, we don’t perform same-sex marriages. That is unnatural. God did not intend it to be thus. Please excuse me, it is a personal comment, it is not Sahaj Marg. But there are things, as Babuji Maharaj said, “If God did not want two sexes, he could have as well created one and seen that the world propagated by itself.” There are unicellular organisms called amoeba which just split when they want. No problems of sex, no problems of love and hate, no problems of, shall we say, illegitimate babies, no need for Viagra. You know, when it is big enough it just splits and there are two. “Behold, there was one and now there are two,” says the Lord. So God could have done anything he wanted, you see. Why two sexes? Not so that one sex should marry among themselves, isn’t it? So, what the church may allow, I don’t have to condone or accept. To me, it is a very blatant misuse of so-called privileges of the human being, fundamental rights, et cetera. Of course, if you claim it is your fundamental right to go the dogs, so be it! Even God cannot stop it. That is not His weakness; that is His strength that he gives us the liberty to do what we will.

It like a boxing father, heavyweight champion, allowing his pugnacious teenagers to pummel away at him. He just laughs, “Yeah, go on, son. Come on, one more.” And the pugnacious son thinks he is going to knock his father out and suddenly, wham, you know. The son is at the corner of the room and the mother is wailing away: “How can you do it to my son?”


Other religions beside the "new religion" called "Sahaj Marg" (meaning: "the easy path") "give Love" or so they seem to claim. Our homosexual brothers and sisters "give love" (to one another). Our children can "give love" and show tolerance for other "religions" if they are not taught such "intolerance" and outright "lies" as in the VBSE curriculum of the SRCM (California-1997). Examples: All religions do not "promote violence and war"!! All religions do not seek God "outside" any more than "spiritual groups" such as SRCM California-1997) who celebrate lavish "birthday bashes" for the Master who sits on his throne, entertained by children, and who build opulent Ashrams with marble, golden lion statues, busts of the Masters, and manicured lawns, much like other "religions" ! If God is truly "inside", SRCM (California-1997) spends a lot of time decorating and reveling in the "outside" with much pomp and ceremony, while the poor and the sick suffer, just like other so-called "corrupt religions".

SRCM (California-1997) and its "first" Master, Chari slanders all other religions, and cultures and discriminates against minorities, and even women who in Sahaj Marg, can be "preceptors" in his SRCM (California-1997) pyramidal organization, so as to attract other "followers" (specially targeting the children), but still can't be "Masters", according to Chari.

SRCM has manipulated it's own history and has claimed (Ram Chandra of Fatehgarh, Lalaji, as the first Master of Sahaj Marg which he is "obviously" not, having his own legitimate lineage in the Sufi NaqshMuMRa organization and in the RamAshram societies. Sahaj Marg was "invented" and founded thirteen years after Lalaji's death by Ram Chandra Saxena of Shahjahanpur, (aka Babuji).

There is no evidence of "reconciliation" between the current Master of SRCM (California-1997), Chari, and the SRCM (Shahjahanpur-1945) presided by Navneet Kumar Saxena, a member of the Family of the Founder... The issue is still in the Supreme Court of India and there are many allegations of "criminal activity" including forgery, violence and murder (war?). (see research on this blog and many other blogs on-line)

This is just a small portion of the "information" available on this issue that demonstrates that this group of businessmen talks one story but acts another. They "Talk the Talk", but they don't "Walk the Walk"!!

If the United Nations wants to promote: Reconciliation, there are many more "reconciliatory" groups with which it could "jump in bed with" or to which it could "attach itself". This group of businessmen seems to be using the UN and its "DPI Program" (Department of Public Information) to clean it's terrible record or LOVE, HARMONY and RECONCILIATION which in REALITY appears to be more "hatred, intolerance, and un-forgiveness" that it attributes to "religion". As is clearly demonstrated in the testimonials of family-members what are not adherents to the Sahaj Marg of the SRCM (California-1997), many abhyasis, who still agree to be "living deads" and "serfs" of their Master as per their "method", also show no "reconciliation" in their now-divided "relationships".

RE-CONCILIATION?? NOT in Sahaj Marg, now a registered trade-mark of the SRCM (California-1997). Sahaj Marg is a trade mark (for commerce), registered to the SRCM (California-1997), which is operated by Sahaj Marg Spirituality Foundation and that "foundation" is registered to Chari and a few of his "inner group" (see here).

To use capitalist businessmen terms: SRCM (California-1997), being a "spiritualism" group, (as opposed to "spirituality"), with their "bible" of messages from the "spirits" of the deceased, channeled by an un-professional and anonymous French lady "medium", is overdrawn at the "reconciliation" bank.

See other articles on this topic:

Chari's Master Stroke with the United Nations DPI
SRCM Dictatorship at the United Nations DPI
United Nations and the Delinquency of SRCM (California-1997)
Suggestions for SRCM (California - 1997) and the United Nations DPI
Lessons for SRCM (California-1997) from Babuji's letter to United Nations (1957)

No comments: