Reaction to the "interviews" of old Preceptors of SRCM

Taken from a comment by Alexis on Elodie's Blog in France: Pour Que Vive le Sahaj Marg


Alexis Said:

Interesting! This confirms that Chari was manipulating behind the scenes so as to take the limelight in 1982 when Babuji had demoted him ...

However, it was already well understood and it is unfortunate that the evidence should not be more specific about what really happened after the death of Babuji.

Once again, they obscure the meeting of July 1983 and they go directly to the conclusions of February, 1984. Why?

No, all members of the working committee did not reject the appointment of Chari to the presidency in 83. KC Narayana and (sister) Kasturi accepted him! And Umesh had not been designated in 83 ...

I invite you to read my questions about this period of 1982-84, they remain intact:

See Alexis' blog: Le Projet Sahaj Marg
http://questcequelesahajmarg.blogspot.com/2008/03/5.html

Since Shashwat is interviewing old preceptors of Sahaj Marg, I invite him to examine specifically the timing of these 3 crucial years, and the decisions taken at each event.

This would provide concrete evidence and not merely subjective positions that one expects to read from those opposed to Chari.

It would also be interesting if he could interview SP Srivastava, KC Narayana, or SA Sarnad.

As for the testimony of Dinaysh Kumar Saxena, it tells us little except the talent of Shashwat to have him say what he wants to hear.

A little more rigor would not be in-appropriate. The testimony would then be strengthened. Here they appear highly questionable ...

Monday June 29 11:14:00 AM